(July 2010)

Unbelievable puzzle... Look at the code below, or better yet, download and run it...

#!/usr/bin/env python
import itertools

# The 100 prisoners problem statement:
#
# The warden places 100 numbers in 100 boxes, at random - with equal
# probability that any number will be in any box. Each convict is assigned
# a number. One by one they enter the room with the boxes, and try to find
# their corresponding number. They can open up to 50 different boxes. Once
# they either find their number or fail, they move on to a different room
# and all of the boxes are returned to exactly how they were before the
# prisoner entered the room.  The prisoners can communicate with each
# other before the game begins, but as soon as it starts they have no way
# to signal to each other. The warden is requiring that all 100 prisoners
# find their numbers!
#
# At first glance, since each of them has 50% chance (0.5), the probability
# of all of them succeeding is (0.5)^100 = .... zero.
#
# And yet, with the approach described below, the chance of success
# (i.e. ALL of them finding their number) is 31.2% !!!
#
# In fact, for N prisoners, with N=2*k, the probability of success is:
#
#            p(success) = 1-(1/M + 1/(M+1) + ... + (1/N))
# where
#            M = N/2 + 1
#
# So, for N=8:   1-(1/5+1/6+1/7+1/8)      = .36547619047
#     for N=10:  1-(1/6+1/7+1/8+1/9+1/10) = .35436507936
#     for N=100: 1-(1/51+1/52+...+ 1/100) = .31182782069
#
# Brilliant description of the puzzle's solution here:
#   http://www.mast.queensu.ca/~peter/inprocess/prisoners.pdf


def CheckSolution(prisoners, perm):
    for i in xrange(prisoners):
        attempt = 0
        idx = i
        found = False
        while attempt < prisoners/2:  # You have N/2 attempts...
            if perm[idx] == i:  # Look in your box...
                found = True    # you found your number, great!
                break
            else:
                idx = perm[idx]  # else "seek" to the number inside the box
            attempt += 1
        if not found:
            return False  # This permutation failed, it had a cycle>N/2
    return True  # This permutation was a good one...


def main():
    for prisoners in xrange(4, 12, 2):  # Do the experiment for 4,6,8,10
        total = 0
        success = 0
        for perm in itertools.permutations(xrange(prisoners)):
            total += 1
            if CheckSolution(prisoners, perm):
                success += 1
        print "When", prisoners, "prisoners,",
        print "Saved:", success, "/", total,
        print "(%5.2f)" % (100.0*success/total)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()
You'll get this:
bash$ python ./100prisoners.py
When 4 prisoners, Saved: 10 / 24 (41.67)
When 6 prisoners, Saved: 276 / 720 (38.33)
When 8 prisoners, Saved: 14736 / 40320 (36.55)
When 10 prisoners, Saved: 1285920 / 3628800 (35.44)


profile for ttsiodras at Stack Overflow, Q&A for professional and enthusiast programmers
GitHub member ttsiodras
 
Index
 
 
CV
 
 
Updated: Fri Aug 9 22:48:30 2013
 

The comments on this website require the use of JavaScript. Perhaps your browser isn't JavaScript capable; or the script is not being run for another reason. If you're interested in reading the comments or leaving a comment behind please try again with a different browser or from a different connection.